On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:24 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 2 Apr 2024, at 00:56, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> I ended up writing the attached doc patch. I found that some or our > text was overly-wordy, causing the impact of what we were trying to say > to be lessened. We might want to go farther than this patch, but I > think it is an improvement.
Agreed, this is an good incremental improvement over what we have.
> I also moved the <strong> text to the bottom of the section
+1
A few small comments:
+considers performing minor upgrades to be less risky than continuing to +run superseded minor versions.</em>
I think "superseded minor versions" could be unnecessarily complicated for non-native speakers, I consider myself fairly used to reading english but still had to spend a few extra (brain)cycles parsing the meaning of it in this context.
+ We recommend that users always run the latest minor release associated
Or perhaps "current minor release" which is the term we use in the table below on the same page?
I do like the term "current" better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest".
