On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 9:24 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> A few small comments:
>
> +considers performing minor upgrades to be less risky than continuing to
> +run superseded minor versions.</em>
>
> I think "superseded minor versions" could be unnecessarily complicated for
> non-native speakers, I consider myself fairly used to reading english but
> still
> had to spend a few extra (brain)cycles parsing the meaning of it in this
> context.
>
> + We recommend that users always run the latest minor release associated
>
> Or perhaps "current minor release" which is the term we use in the table
> below
> on the same page?
>
> I do like the term "current" better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we
> really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference
> "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest".
Okay, I changed "superseded" to "old", and changed "latest" to
"current", patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
