On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 1:21 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 12.06.25 08:26, jian he wrote:
> > in contrib/amcheck/verify_heapam.c, check_tuple
> > report_corruption(ctx,
> > psprintf("number of attributes %u exceeds
> > maximum expected for table %u",
> > ctx->natts,
> > RelationGetDescr(ctx->rel)->natts));
>
> Agreed this is misleading.
>
> > i think it should be
> > report_corruption(ctx,
> > psprintf("number of attributes %u exceeds
> > maximum expected for table %u",
> > ctx->natts,
> > RelationGetRelid(ctx->rel)));
> >
> > or we can rephrase it another way, also mentioning
> > ``RelationGetDescr(ctx->rel)->natts``.
>
> I think they did want to mention RelationGetDescr(ctx->rel)->natts. How
> about
>
> "number of attributes %u exceeds maximum expected for table (%u)"
>
ctx->natts is "int", so it should be
psprintf( "number of attributes %d exceeds maximum expected for table (%u)",
ctx->natts, RelationGetRelid(ctx->rel));
?
we also need change src/bin/pg_amcheck/t/004_verify_heapam.pl
in there, we have
push @expected,
qr/${$header}number of attributes 67 exceeds maximum
expected for table 3/;
push @expected,
qr/${$header}number of attributes 2047 exceeds maximum
expected for table 3/;