Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II)
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsHEuN7KpZDC+Q1G0v6pDCSdjkOSOjO9mPwY+gxxAxHWLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II)  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II)
Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view

I wrote:
> ...but arguably the earlier check is close enough that it's silly to assert in the "else" branch, and I'd be okay with just nuking those lines. Another thing that caught my attention is the assumption that unsetting a bit is so expensive that we have to first check if it's set, so we may as well remove "IS_BRACKET(Np->Num)" as well.

The attached is what I mean. I'll commit this this week unless there are objections.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 金
Date:
Subject: If there are more than two functions in different schemas, the functions have the same name and same arguments, \df[+] only display the function that schema first appeared in the search_path.
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: If there are more than two functions in different schemas, the functions have the same name and same arguments, \df[+] only display the function that schema first appeared in the search_path.