Re: OOM in spgist insert - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: OOM in spgist insert
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEHztoWa2stNE9J1gCdj-zMJodN0a9ng0HF1mXtOspmfKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OOM in spgist insert  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: OOM in spgist insert
Re: OOM in spgist insert
List pgsql-hackers
Now when checking for shortening of  leaf tuple is added LongValuesOK become slightly redundant. I'd propose to replace it with more legible name as LongValuesOK doesn't mean they are warranted to be ok just that we can try to shorten them? What about tryShortening, trySuffixing or can(Try)ShortenTuple?


--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: View invoker privileges
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel INSERT SELECT take 2