On 2025/07/04 17:25, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
>
>> On 4 Jul 2025, at 10:50, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>
>> From the discussion in [1], it seems this typedef was originally used as
>> a function argument in early versions of the patch. However,
>> the argument was removed in v23, and the typedef was accidentally left behind.
>
> Yes, your analysis is correct. We could make common checking function and argument was not needed.
>
>>
>> The attached patch removes this unused typedef to clean up the dead code.
>> Thoughts?
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks for fixing this!
Thanks for the review! I've pushed the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation
