Re: PG 18 beta1 release notes misses mention of pg_noreturn - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: PG 18 beta1 release notes misses mention of pg_noreturn
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5s+GHMnZ+prhJ-yN4U4+zYuLk2gb-cOBX3yp5JLagimYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 18 beta1 release notes misses mention of pg_noreturn  (Steve Chavez <steve@supabase.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 8:08 PM Steve Chavez <steve@supabase.io> wrote:
>
> Yes, otherwise I had to grep the commits in `git log` and find what's the correct way to use `pg_noreturn`.
> It's not a simple keyword replacement since the order has to change now:
>
> Old: void my_worker(Datum main_arg) pg_attribute_noreturn();
>
> New: pg_noreturn void my_worker(Datum main_arg);
>
> I've added the link to the commit in the patch, which should be enough to infer the above.
>
> How can I get this committed? Is the hacker mailing list the right place for release notes correction?
>

This is the right place to discuss this. Please add your patch to the
commitfest App. https://commitfest.postgresql.org/. The landing page
has a useful link for first timers.

> Best regards,
> Steve Chavez
>

Please do not top-post, reply inline as I have done.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Explicitly enable meson features in CI
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: amcheck: Remove unused IndexCheckableCallback typedef