Thread: Re: ECPG Refactor: move sqlca variable in ecpg_log()

Re: ECPG Refactor: move sqlca variable in ecpg_log()

From
Alvaro Herrera
Date:
On 2024-Oct-10, Yuto Sasaki (Fujitsu) wrote:

> The sqlca variable in the ecpg_log() was declared with an unnecessarily wide
> scope, so I moved to the appropriate place.

Hmm, I'm not sure we want that, because if we do this, then
ECPGget_sqlca() gets run with the debug_mutex held.  In the original
coding, it's run without the mutex.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Voy a acabar con todos los humanos / con los humanos yo acabaré
voy a acabar con todos (bis) / con todos los humanos acabaré ¡acabaré! (Bender)



Re: ECPG Refactor: move sqlca variable in ecpg_log()

From
Fujii Masao
Date:

On 2024/10/16 15:04, Yuto Sasaki (Fujitsu) wrote:
>  >Hmm, I'm not sure we want that, because if we do this, then
>  >ECPGget_sqlca() gets run with the debug_mutex held.  In the original
>  >coding, it's run without the mutex.
> 
> Thank you for pointing that out. I agree with your observation. But there is
> another room for improvement - we can avoid unnecessary calls to ECPGget_sqlca()
> by moving just before mutex lock.

+1

> PSA a patch.

The patch looks good to me.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION




Re: ECPG Refactor: move sqlca variable in ecpg_log()

From
Tom Lane
Date:
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> I've attached the latest version of the patch, now including the commit log.
> Unless there are any objections, I'll proceed with committing it.

LGTM.  Maybe move down the sqlca variable declaration, so that the
declarations still match the order in which the variables are
initialized?  That's just cosmetic of course.

            regards, tom lane



Re: ECPG Refactor: move sqlca variable in ecpg_log()

From
Fujii Masao
Date:

On 2024/10/21 23:25, Fujii Masao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/10/19 2:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>>> I've attached the latest version of the patch, now including the commit log.
>>> Unless there are any objections, I'll proceed with committing it.
>>
>> LGTM.  Maybe move down the sqlca variable declaration, so that the
>> declarations still match the order in which the variables are
>> initialized?  That's just cosmetic of course.
> 
> Thanks for the review! I've updated the patch accordingly, i.e.,
> moved the declaration of the sqlca variable right after fmt.
> The v3 patch is attached.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION